x
Breaking News
More () »

CA Prop 5: California rejects measure to expand property tax break

California voters have rejected a ballot measure to expand a property tax break for older homeowners who move, sparing schools and local governments a major revenue loss.
CA Prop 5: California rejects measure to expand property tax break

UPDATE as of Wednesday, Nov 7 | 12:50 p.m.: With 100 percent of precincts reporting, 58 percent have voted no on Prop. 5, 42 percent have voted yes. 

SAN DIEGO (AP) — California voters have rejected a ballot measure to expand a property tax break for older homeowners who move, sparing schools and local governments a major revenue loss.

Under current law, seniors and near-seniors can transfer tax assessments if their new homes are worth the same or less than the ones they sell, and they can only do it only once. Current law also limits out-of-county transfers.

Proposition 5, backed by the California Association of Realtors, would have allowed over-55 homeowners to transfer their assessments to any new home — no matter what it costs — anywhere in the state and as many times as they wish.

It was a low-key campaign with high stakes.

"Today's decisive defeat sends a strong message to the California Association of Realtors that voters won't tolerate self-interested initiatives that attack the critical local services that strengthen our communities," Graham Knaus, executive director of the California State Association of Counties, one of the main backers of the No on Prop 5 campaign, said late Tuesday.

The Legislative Analyst's Office concluded that schools and local governments would each probably lose more than $100 million in property tax revenue a year initially and that, over time, those losses would reach about $1 billion a year for each. About 85,000 homeowners over 55 who move every year without the tax break would pay much less.

Current law requires the state to provide more funding to most schools to cover property tax losses. Not so for local governments.

Supporters said passage would end a "moving penalty" on older people and encourage more to sell, helping alleviate California's housing shortage. The Legislative Analyst's Office estimated home sales would increase by tens of thousands a year.

The Realtors funded a consultant's report that contended Proposition 5 would have much less impact on state and local governments, resulting in annual losses of $120 million to annual gains of $200 million.

Opponents challenged the assertion that Proposition 5 would spur construction and warned about a hit to public services.

As a result of Proposition 13 passed in 1978, a home is typically taxed at 1.1 percent of the purchase price and increases no more than 2 percent a year. Prices have risen much more, sticking many homeowners with much higher taxes when they move.

Supporters raised $13.2 million as of Oct. 23, mostly from the Realtors, whose benefit from sales commissions. But the campaign only spent about half of what it raised and didn't engage in television advertising or direct mailers.

Opponents raised $2.8 million, largely from the Service Employees International Union and California Teachers Association.

The Realtors recently filed notice with authorities that it would try again on the November 2020 ballot if Tuesday's measure failed. Chris Carlisle, its legislative advocate, said it was "just to signal to our opponent we are not going away. If we lose this time, we will be back in 2020."


California Prop 5 Explained:

To view video on YouTube, click here.

SAN DIEGO (NEWS 8) - News 8 takes a look at California propositions that you'll be voting on in November and exactly what they mean.

Basically, Prop 5 gives a break on property taxes to disabled individuals or those over 55 years old when they’re ready to move. 

It removes certain transfer requirements for homeowners over 55, severely disabled homeowners, and contaminated or disaster-destroyed property, according to California's Official Voter Information Guide

Schools and local governments each would lose over $100 million in annual property taxes early on, growing to about $1 billion per year. Similar increase in state costs to backfill school property tax losses.

Related: California Props 1-4 explained: All you need to know about bonds

A 'Yes' vote on this measure means: All homeowners who are over 55 (or who meet other qualifications) would be eligible for property tax savings when they move to a different home.

Related: California Prop 6 explained: The gas tax battle

A 'No' vote on this measure means: Certain homeowners who are over 55 (or who meet other qualifications) would continue to be eligible for property tax savings when they move to a different home.

Prop 5 Graphic 2

Before You Leave, Check This Out